Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the better-wp-security domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114
CAAC type certifies Comac ARJ21-700 – Bangalore Aviation
COMAC Image.

CAAC type certifies Comac ARJ21-700

January 2, 2015 2 Comments 469 Views

Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC) has issued an ARJ21-700 aircraft type certificate to Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China, Ltd. (COMAC). The airworthiness certification of CAAC, indicates that the ARJ21 has met the requirements of China Civil Aviation Regulations CCAR-25-R3.

The ARJ21 (Advanced Regional Jet) project was part of China’s 10th 5 year plan. The aircraft was originally scheduled to enter commercial service in 2007, but has suffered from numerous delays. The ARJ21-700 aircraft is a regional jet. The aircraft will be sold in three variants – a passenger, freighter and business variants. The ARJ21-700 aircraft will have 90 seats in an all economy configuration and a range of 2,225-3,700 km. The aircraft is powered by two General Electric CF34-10A engines.

The ARJ21 is expected to enter commercial service this year with Chengdu Airlines.

About Vedant Agarwal

A frequent flyer for both work and pleasure - Vedant has held elite status on many of the major alliances and airlines. Also an avid aviation photographer, his pictures have been published in and on the covers of many international publications.

Check Also

PARIS 2019: Mitsubishi announces first order for SpaceJet M100

Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation has announced that it has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) for …

2 comments

  1. sahirs
    January 2, 2015 at 19:40

    From the angle of attack, I take it this photo was taken during one of the tail scraping tests? If not, it seems pretty aggressive for a normal takeoff!

+OK
+OK